![]() not just the stock or even the hinge.īut as much as I hate to give Muley a lot of credit - i do think he and others have a very valid point - that for hunting accuracy - why would you need any thing else?Įven though my Omega is not a break action it is a very accurate rifle and a very good rifle. I do prefer the bolt action to the break action for many reasons. I could go on with the forearm problem, but I think you guys already know what those problems are. Since the forearm is not solidly attached to the action it can cause alot of problems down the road. Specifically the biggest problem is the forearm. But a two piece stock is definitely not as strong as a one piece stock.Īlso the biggest problem the break action's have with accuracy is the fact that it has a two piece stock. This is not to say that a two piece stock is not strong enough to do the job-because it is. ![]() A one piece stock is definitely stronger than a two piece stock. I am only saying a bolt action will be a more accurate design. All the rifles talked about here are definitely strong enough, and accurate enough for their intended purpose. Or that Encore's or CVA's are inferior because of their design. I am not trying to say Knight rifles are better because they have a bolt. It really is common knowledge in the shooting world. I am not sure how anyone could think otherwise. It is just simply a fact that a bolt action is inherently more accurate. Or that a break action is not accurate enough to accomplish hunting accuracy. This is not to say a break action is not strong enough. In another thread I postd that a bolt action is inherently a more accurate action than a break action firearm. So I wil try to explain my point in a separate thread. I did not want to Hogg(pun intended) up another's post with this.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |